Jump to content

Commons:Featured picture candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Shortcut
This project page in other languages:

Other featured candidates

   📽️ Media

Skip to current candidates Skip to current candidates

Featured picture candidates

Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures.

Old candidates for featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026 and current month.

For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election.

Formal things

Nominating

Guidelines for nominators

Please read the complete guidelines before nominating.

This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:

  • Licensing – Images licensed with solely "GFDL" or "GFDL and an NC-only license" are not acceptable due the restrictions placed on re-use by these licenses.
  • Resolution – Raster images of lower resolution than 2 million pixels (pixels, not bytes) are typically rejected unless there are strong mitigating reasons. This does not apply to vector graphics (SVGs).
    • Graphics on Commons are not only viewed on conventional computer screens. They may be used in high-resolution print versions, and the images may be cropped to focus on portions of the image. See Commons:Why we need high resolution media for more information.
  • Scans – While not official policy, Help:Scanning provides advice on the preparation of various types of images that may be useful.
  • General quality – pictures being nominated should be of high technical quality.
  • Digital manipulations must not deceive the viewer. Digital manipulation for the purpose of correcting flaws in an image is generally acceptable, provided it is limited, well-done, and not intended to deceive.
    • For photographs, typical acceptable manipulations include cropping, perspective correction, sharpening/blurring, and color/exposure correction. More extensive manipulations, such as removal of distracting background elements, should be clearly described in the image text, by means of the {{Retouched picture}} template. Undescribed or mis-described manipulations which cause the main subject to be misrepresented are never acceptable. For images made from more than one photo, you can use the {{Panorama}} or {{Focus stacked image}} templates.
    • For historic images, acceptable manipulations might include digitally fixing rips, removal of stains, cleanup of dirt, and, for mass-produced artworks such as engravings, removal of flaws inherent to the particular reproduction, such as over-inking. Careful color adjustments may be used to bring out the original work from the signs of ageing, though care should be taken to restore a natural appearance. The original artistic intent should be considered when deciding whether it is appropriate to make a change. Edits to historic material should be documented in detail within the file description, and an unedited version should be uploaded and cross linked for comparison.
  • Value – our main goal is to feature most valuable pictures from all others. Pictures should be in some way special, so please be aware that:
    • almost all sunsets are aesthetically pleasing, and most such pictures are not in essence different from others,
    • night-shots are pretty but normally more details can be shown on pictures taken at daytime,
    • beautiful does not always mean valuable.
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documents

There are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject.

Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable.

Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself.

Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well.

Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:

  • Notable in its own right: Works by major artists, or works that are otherwise notable, such as the subjects of a controversy.
  • Of high artistic merit: Works which, while not particularly well known, are nonetheless wonderful examples of their particular type or school of art.
  • Of high historic merit: The historical method values very early illustrations of scenes and events over later ones. Hence, a work of poor quality depicting a contemporaneous historical event can be nonetheless important, even if the artistic merit is relatively low. Likewise, scans or photographs of important documents – which may not be at all artistic – nonetheless may be highly valuable if the documents are historically significant. The reason for the image's historical importance should be briefly stated in the nomination, for those reviewers unfamiliar with the subject.
  • Of high illustrative merit: Works that illustrate or help explain notable subjects, for instance, illustrations of books, scientific subjects, or technical processes. The amount of artistic merit required for these will vary by subject, but, for instance, an illustration that makes the working of a complicated piece of machinery very clear need not be notable as a piece of artwork as well, whereas an illustration for a book might well be expected to reach much higher artistic standards.

Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced."

Photographs

On the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.

  • Focus – every important object in the picture should normally be sharp.
  • Exposure refers to the shutter diaphragm combination that renders an image with a tonal curve that ideally is able to represent in acceptable detail shadows and highlights within the image. This is called latitude. Images can be on the low side of the tonal curve (low range), the middle (middle range) or high side (upper range). Lack of shadow detail is not necessarily a negative characteristic. In fact, it can be part of the desired effect. Burned highlights in large areas are a distracting element.
  • Composition refers to the arrangement of the elements within the image. The "Rule of thirds" is one useful guideline. Horizons should almost never be placed in the middle, where they "cut" the image in half. Often, a horizon creating a top or bottom third of the space works better. The main idea is to use space to create a dynamic image.
    • Foreground and background – foreground and background objects may be distracting. You should check that something in front of the subject doesn't hide important elements and that something in background doesn't spoil the composition (for example that the streetlight doesn't "stand" on someone's head).
  • Movement control refers to the manner in which motion is represented in the image. Motion can be frozen or blurred. Neither one is better than the other. It is the intention of representation. Movement is relative within the objects of the image. For example, photographing a race car that appears frozen in relation to the background does not give us a sense of speed or motion, so technique dictates to represent the car in a frozen manner but with a blurred background, thus creating the sense of motion, this is called "panning". On the other hand, representing a basketball player in a high jump frozen in relation to everything else, due to the "unnatural" nature of the pose would be a good photograph.
  • Depth of field (DOF) refers to the area in focus in front of and beyond main subject. Depth of field is chosen according to the specific needs of every picture. Large or small DOF can either way add or subtract to the quality of the image. Low depth of field can be used to bring attention to the main subject, separating it from the general environment. High depth of field can be used to emphasize space. Short focal length lenses (wide angles) yield large DOF, and vice versa, long focal lenses (telephotos) have shallow DOF. Small apertures yield large DOF and conversely, large apertures yield shallow DOF.

On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.

  • Shape refers to the contour of the main subjects.
  • Volume refers to the three dimensional quality of the object. This is accomplished using side light. Contrary to general belief, front lighting is not the best light. It tends to flatten subject. Best light of day is early morning or late afternoon.
  • Color is important. Oversaturated colors are not good.
  • Texture refers to the quality of the surface of the subject. It is enhanced by side lighting… it is the "feel" to the touch.
  • Perspective refers to the "angle" accompanied by lines that disappear into a vanishing point that may or may not be inside the image.
  • Balance refers to the arrangement of subjects within the image that can either give equal weight or appear to be heavier on one side.
  • Proportion refers to the relation of size of objects in picture. Generally, we tend to represent small objects small in relation to others, but a good technique is to represent small objects large contrary to natural size relationship. For example, a small flower is given preponderance over a large mountain…. This is called inversion of scales.
Not all elements must be present. Some photographs can be judged on individual characteristics, that is, an image can be about color or texture, or color AND texture, etc.
  • Noise refers to unwanted corruption of color brightness and quality and can be caused by underexposure. It is not a desirable quality and can be grounds for opposition.
  • Symbolic meaning or relevance … Opinion wars can begin here … A bad picture of a very difficult subject is better than a good picture of an ordinary subject. A good picture of a difficult subject is an extraordinary photograph.
Images can be culturally biased by the photographer and/or the observer. The meaning of the image should be judged according to the cultural context of the image, not by the cultural context of the observer. An image "speaks" to people, and it has the capacity to evoke emotion such as tenderness, rage, rejection, happiness, sadness, etc. Good photographs are not limited to evoking pleasant sensations …

You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating.

Video and audio

Please nominate videos, sounds, music, PDFs, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates.

Set nominations

If a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:

  • Faithful digital reproductions of works notable in their own right, which the original author clearly intended to be viewed as a set. Examples: pages in a pamphlet, crops (puzzle pieces) of a prohibitively large scan, a pair of pendant paintings. Not acceptable: Arbitrary selection of sample works by an artist.
  • A sequence of images showing the passage of time. They could depict frames of a moving/changing object or a static object during different times of day or different seasons. Examples: diagrams illustrating a process, steps of a dance, metamorphosis of an insect, maps/drawings/photos of the same subject over the years (frame of view should be more or less the same).
  • A group of images depicting the same subject from different viewpoints, preferably taken under the same lighting conditions when possible. Examples: Exterior and interior of a building, different facades of a building, different interior views, obverse and inverse of a banknote/coin. Not acceptable: A selection of different rooms in a skyscraper, the facade of a church plus an organ, any images of fundamentally different scopes.
  • A group of images which show all possible variations of a particular class of object. Examples: Male and female versions of an animal (preferably in the same setting), all known species of a genus. Not acceptable: A few breeds of cats (unless they share a defining characteristic and represent all possible examples of that).


Adding a new nomination

If you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate name, quality, image description, categories and licensing, then do the following.

Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button.

All single files:

For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2

All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".


Step 2: follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save that page.

Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg}}

Nominations are time-sensitive and for one-time use only. An automatic clock starts as soon as they are created. Do not create them in advance, save them for later or re-activate them.

Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports An image will only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.

Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using {{subst:FPC-notice|Your image filename.jpg}} -- ~~~~.

Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. They should be added by, or at the request of, the nominator.

An 'Alternative' is created by adding a sub-section to the nomination page: ====Alternative==== [[File:Foo.jpg|300px]] *{{info}} A short description.

Voting

Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 100 constructive, stable edits on Commons (excluding user and talk pages) can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed.

You may use the following templates:

  • {{Support}} ( Support),
  • {{Oppose}} ( Oppose),
  • {{Neutral}} ( Neutral),
  • {{Comment}} ( Comment),
  • {{Info}} ( Info),
  • {{Question}} ( Question),
  • {{Request}} ( Request).

You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator.

A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above.

Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:

  • No reason
  • "I don't like it" and other empty assessments
  • "You can do better" and other criticisms of the author/nominator rather than the image

Remember also to put your signature (~~~~).

Over time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:

Text to use Displays as Meaning
{{Keep}}  Keep It deserves to remain a featured picture.
{{Delist}}  Delist It does not deserve to be a featured picture anymore.

This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:

Text to use Displays as Meaning
{{Keep}}  Keep Do not replace the old image with the new image as a FP.
{{Delistandreplace}}  Delist and replace Replace the current FP with the proposed replacement.

If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box:


In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:

  • Information on the origin of the image (creator, uploader);
  • A link to the original FP nomination (it will appear under "Links" on the image description page);
  • Your reasons for nominating the image and your username.

After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list.

As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose.

General rules

  1. The voting period is 9 complete days counted from the nomination. After the end of this period the result will be determined. Votes added on day 10 and after are not counted.
  2. Nominations by anonymous contributors are welcome.
  3. Contributions to discussion by anonymous contributors are welcome.
  4. Only registered contributors whose Commons accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Exception: registered users can always vote in their own nominations no matter the account age and number of edits.
  5. Nominations do not count as votes. Support must be explicitly stated.
  6. Nominators and authors can withdraw their nominated pictures at any time. This is done by adding the following template: {{Withdraw}} ~~~~. Also, remember that if more than one version is nominated, you should explicitly state which version you are withdrawing.
  7. Remember, the goal of the Wikimedia Commons project is to provide a central repository for free images to be used by all Wikimedia projects, including possible future projects. This is not simply a repository for Wikipedia images, so images should not be judged here on their suitability for that project.
  8. Rules of the 5th day based on vote counts on day number 5 (day of nomination + 5):
    1. Pictures are speedy declined if they have fewer than two support votes.
    2. Pictures are speedy promoted if they have 10 support votes or more and no oppose votes. (Note that if it takes more than five days to reach this threshold, the picture can be promoted as soon as it is reached.) This does not apply to nominations containing at least one ‘Alternative’ image – because it is possible that another image can overtake the one in the lead during the last days, such nominations are never closed early.
    3. Once either speedy criterion is reached, the voting period is considered closed, and no more votes may be added.
  9. Pictures tagged {{FPX}} may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied, provided there are no support votes other than that of the nominator.
  10. Pictures tagged {{FPD}} (FP-Denied) may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied.
  11. Only two active nominations by the same user (that is, nominations under review and not yet closed) are allowed. The main purpose of this measure is to contribute to a better average quality of nominations, by driving nominators/creators to choose carefully the pictures presented to the forum.

Featuring and delisting rules

A candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:

  1. Appropriate license (of course)
  2. At least seven  Support votes (or 7  Delist votes for a delist) at the end of nine days
  3. Ratio of supporting/opposing votes at least 2/1 (a two-thirds majority); same for delist/keep votes
  4. Two different versions of the same picture cannot both be featured, but only the one with higher level of support, as determined by the closer. Whenever the closer is not sure which version has consensus to be featured, they should attempt to contact the voters to clarify their opinions if not clear from the nomination page.
  5. Only two active delisting nominations per user, which is in addition to the limit of two active regular nominations.

The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5.

The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules.

Above all, be polite

Please don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care.

Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken.

See also

Table of contents

List may contain works considered Not Safe for Work (nudity).

Nominators are requested, out of courtesy, to include the {{Nsfw}} template with such images. Users may select the gadget in user preferences "Deferred display of images tagged with {{Nsfw}} on COM:FPC" to enable the template's effect of hiding the image until selected.

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
⚠️ Important notice ⚠️
A vote is currently underway to decide whether the FPC promotion rules should be changed by requiring more than seven votes for an image to be promoted and/or by increasing the required support ratio above 2:1.

All users eligible to vote on FPC are invited to vote on this page.

This temporary notice will be removed after the vote is over.
Shortcut

File:Црква „Св. Петар и Павле“ - Бистрица 8.jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Jan 2026 at 22:23:40 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The interior of the dome of Sts. Peter and Paul Church of the Bistrica Monastery

File:House Finch (m) (50660214338).jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Jan 2026 at 21:39:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Jésus meurt sur la Croix - Vitraux 19 de la Basilique Notre-Dame de Gèneve - GT 2026 01 (HDR Pano).jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Jan 2026 at 20:35:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Stained-glass windows nr. 19 of the Notre-Dame Basilica of Geneva.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Single_stained_glass_windows
  •  Info The stained glass window pictured is the number 19 in the Basilica of Notre-Dame in Geneva. Specifically, it depicts the Crucifixion, showing Jesus dying on the cross. It was created and installed in 1859 by the artist Claudius Lavergne. If anyone would like to attempt to replicate this photograph, I recommend taking it in the late afternoon, when the sun finally shines through the window; the almost hidden words "LASSEZ-DIRE" at the bottom cast a shadow over the nave of the Basilica. It remains one of the most intriguing "hidden" messages in Geneva's architecture. It is a phrase that works on three levels: it honors the regional history of Savoy, interprets Christ's silence under derision, and affirms the right of a minority faith to exist in a hostile city. Ultimately, Lavergne's stained glass window reminds the observer that, in the face of suffering or judgment, there is a certain power in simply letting the world speak, remaining focused on the Cross. We must also consider the political climate of Geneva in the mid-19th century. The Catholic community was often viewed with suspicion by the Genevan authorities. Every stone laid and every window installed was a declaration of presence that drew criticism from both the secular and Protestant press. For Lavergne and the clergy of the time, "Laissez-dire" may have been a community mantra. It was a message to the faithful: let critics mock our processions; let newspapers denigrate our dogmas. We will remain steadfast like this stained glass window. It is a motto of resilience, suggesting that the truth of the "Dieu mourant" (the dying God) needs no defense against the fleeting opinions of men. But beware, this is not just criticism: it is also a true sign of peace with the local Protestant community, free to believe as they wish, for the sake of the faith. This enigma makes Lavergne's stained glass window nr.19 so magnificent. Created, uploaded, nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 20:35, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 20:35, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:31, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Юрий Д.К. 21:53, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --Yann (talk) 21:54, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support In high resolution, this capture in vivid color and exquisite detail is extraordinary - a striking work alongside the previously promoted (01) and (02). -- Radomianin (talk) 22:23, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Solar Orbiter’s widest high-res view of the Sun ESA508430.jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Jan 2026 at 18:30:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sun photographed by Solar Orbiter on 9 March 2025, at around only 77 million km from the Sun. The image combines about 200 individual images into the widest high-resolution view of the Sun yet.

File:Civetta Monte Pore Marmolada.jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Jan 2026 at 13:02:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Skiing in the in the Dolomites. The Civetta, Monte Pore and Marmolada mountains.

File:20250503 Libellula quadrimaculata NZ92000.jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Jan 2026 at 12:15:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Libellula Quadrimaculata with her own exuviae to the left

File:Дуфски цевковод 3.jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Jan 2026 at 08:20:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A pipeline intersects the Duf River near the eponymous village

File:Evening view of the pond at Oizumi Ryokuchi Park, September 2024 - 2260.jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Jan 2026 at 02:29:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Evening view of the pond at Oizumi Ryokuchi Park.

File:Mikrofotol on kõrvuti kaks karpvähilist ehk ostrakoodi (Ostracoda).jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Jan 2026 at 17:24:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Botzer von Norden.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Jan 2026 at 15:44:20 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of the Botzer in the Stubai Alps, South Tyrol

File:Benasque - Aigualluts - Pico de la Mina 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Jan 2026 at 14:35:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Summit Pico de la Mina (2708), as seen from Forau de Aigualluts. Huesca, Aragon, Spain

File:DSC01033 Polizia di Stato Vehicle Registration Plate on an Alfa Romeo Giulia.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Jan 2026 at 13:33:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Vehicle registration plate on an Alfa Romeo Giulia of the Italian Polizia di Stato

File:Painted storks (Mycteria leucocephala) in flight Pearaing.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Jan 2026 at 10:55:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Painted storks (Mycteria leucocephala)

File:Бишкек, Воскресенская церковь, вход.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Jan 2026 at 09:32:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Entrance. Resurrection church, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.

File:Бухара, Ситораи Мохи-Хосса, ворота (4).jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Jan 2026 at 09:28:13 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Top of aiwan of the Main Gate of Sitori-i-Mokhi Khosa palace, Bukhara, Uzbekistan.

File:Weißer Knochenhartporling (Osteina obducta) Bruderwald-20251112-RM-160404.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Jan 2026 at 09:12:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

White bone-hard polypore (Osteina obducta) in the Bruderwald forest in Bamberg

Arothron manilensis

Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2026 at 20:45:40 (UTC)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page

  • Front view
    Front view
  • Side view
    Side view
JayCubby: I made some WB changes, what do you think? Poco a poco (talk) 20:26, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Looks great. Thanks, complaint  withdrawn. JayCubby (talk) 20:28, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I hope your "withdrawn" doesn't confuse the bot. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:38, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I subst'd the template. It has so far ignored it, so I think it's safe. JayCubby (talk) 14:08, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:L'Annonciation - Vitraux 14 de la Basilique Notre-Dame de Gèneve - GT 2025 04 (HDR).jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2026 at 18:00:40 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Annunciation, stained glass window no. 14 of the Notre-Dame Basilica, Geneva.
Procedural question
  •  Support Clearly a truly exceptional candidate because it shows the stained-glass window with its surroundings, both in best quality. This is much more informative as well as aesthetically much more pleasing than the traditional ‘stained glass on black(ish) background’ photos; only a few of our FPs achieve this, and from my own one I know how difficult it is to combine a proper exposure of the stained-glass window with a proper exposure of the surroundings without loosing sharpness, detail resolution, etc. – Aristeas (talk) 11:04, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support I would certainly have voted for it if it had been part of a set. Although the resolution of this image is lower than that of the previously promoted images by the same author (01, 02), I still consider the quality sufficient, and the photo's pleasant atmosphere is, in my view, a key factor. Including the immediate surroundings of the window was a good choice, as it enhances the mood of the scene. I would also support a delist-and-replace nomination afterwards. -- Radomianin (talk) 14:32, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zittend naakt, Amedeo Modigliani, (1917), Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Antwerpen, 2060.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2026 at 17:45:57 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Seated Nude by Modigliani

Lunulicardia hemicardium

Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2026 at 16:27:42 (UTC)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page

  • Right valve
    Right valve
  • Left valve
    Left valve

File:Great cormorant at Tennōji Park in Osaka, June 2017 - 840.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2026 at 16:22:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Great cormorant at Tennōji Park in Osaka.
✓ Done Press Ctrl+F5. --Laitche (talk) 20:23, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Beatles Abbey Road album cover.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2026 at 14:27:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Front cover of Abbey Road by The Beatles

File:Common green bottle flies (Lucilia sericata) female left and male Bürgerpark.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2026 at 10:45:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Common green bottle flies (Lucilia sericata) female left and male

File:ILanz, plaats in Graubünden. 27-09-2025. (actm.) 06.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2026 at 05:29:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Large-billed Crow in Bhigwan August 2025 by Tisha Mukherjee 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Jan 2026 at 15:47:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Large-billed Crow (Corvus macrorhynchos)

File:Serpiente marina de hocico ancho (Laticauda colubrina), Anilao, Filipinas, 2023-08-25, DD 129.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Jan 2026 at 21:52:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Female Yellow-lipped sea krait (Laticauda colubrina), Anilao, Philippines.
  •  Comment I suppose 5k camera have face detection, which lock on eyes of subject. But nowdays could be locked on your pupil too. I gues 5DS have at least 1st one. --Mile (talk) 16:52, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blick durch die Gewölbe an der Götzschtalbrücke.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Jan 2026 at 20:51:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Göltzschtal Bridge is the largest brick bridge in the world. It has 98 arches through which one can see parallel to the bridge's course in the middle.

File:Bengal Bushlark in Baruipur October 2025 by Tisha Mukherjee 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Jan 2026 at 15:12:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bengal Bushlark (Plocealauda assamica)

File:Self-portrait October 2014-1a.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Jan 2026 at 14:07:19 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  •  Support Very nice idea, good execution. The image first appears as a little riddle (how did the guy come into the metal surface? and where is the rest of his body?), until we realize that this is the reflection of the photographer, looking up to a reflecting ceiling. The combination of simplicity (minimalist composition) with complexity (riddle of reflection) distinguishes the photo and makes it a FP. – Aristeas (talk) 12:30, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Nice idea and amazing at the first glance, but the technical execution doesn't meet the FP standards I Think. --Milseburg (talk) 14:39, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Nice idea and well done. -- XRay 💬 19:14, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak oppose As one of those people that look for some educational value even at commons FPC, this has none, to be frank. I also do not think this was executed against technical difficulties or produced a very unique or striking result. Sorry. —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 04:05, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Agree with other supporters. Looks like a solid photograph in pure photography terms. It’s sort of conceptual, somewhat thought provoking, even full blown artistic. Also different in the flow. It does have some educational value: it can be used to teach composition, styles of photography and creative self-portraits. --Argenberg (talk) 12:02, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Per above: nice idea. I can't even understand what the creator saw as so extraordinary in it. heylenny (talk/edits) 01:52, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Per above. --Aciarium (talk) 15:31, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:T-40 tractor in Urmetan, Tajikistan (трактор Т-40, Урметан, Таджикистан).jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Jan 2026 at 12:08:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

:T-40 tractor in Urmetan, Tajikistan (трактор Т-40, Урметан, Таджикистан)

File:019 European bee-eater in flight in in Pfyn-Finges Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Jan 2026 at 10:38:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

European bee-eater in flight
  • Thank you very much for your detailed explanation and for providing the comparison to your previous flight shot of the Lilac-breasted Roller, which I supported at the time and still fully stand by. I sincerely appreciate the enormous challenge of photographing such a small, fast-moving bird, and I must admit that I have no personal experience with subjects this difficult to capture. I recognize the high resolution, excellent posture, and well-lit composition in this image. While some areas still appear slightly processed or sharpened to my eyes, I fully understand that these adjustments are largely unavoidable given the speed of the bird and the high resolution. My Neutral vote reflects this technical hesitation, but I greatly respect the skill and effort involved, and I can see why many would consider this an FP-level image. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 11:18, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose I agree that judging images at 100% (or 150/200% on many browsers, due to display scaling) is unfair to higher resolution images. However, I don't think that's the best argument here. This is unquestionably a difficult and beautiful shot, but it is also unquestionaly overprocessed. In my opinion, a lighter touch would produce a better and more usable image. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 11:32, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Neutral This is probably the most difficult vote I have ever cast here. I am torn between strong support and oppose. On the one hand this is absolutely one of the most impressive, most difficult and most laudable photos on Commons. On the other hand, I have rebuked Charles more than once for the artificial impression some of his photos gave due to strong noise removal and sharpening, and it would be unfair if I would judge this photo differently. I agree completely with Julesvernex2’s remark that “a lighter touch would produce a better and more usable image”, and if some people demand that we should support only truly outstanding candidates, unfavourable post-processing must certainly be taken into account. This is also a dilemma for the photographer, and in a case like this, it’s impossible to please everyone. Many FP regulars take offense at image noise, perceiving it as flawed and unnatural. The dominance of smartphone photos certainly contributes to this impression, as they are usually radically denoised and sharpened, causing our visual habits to adapt and perceive their peculiar rendering (no noise, no or blurred fine details, but heavily sharpened edges) as correct. On the other hand, there are those annoying hardcore raw photographers like me who insist that so-called shot noise is just natural, that it should be reduced only carefully, that a completely smooth photo looks artificial, and that “painterly” smudged edges, as often produced by AI tools, have no place in a photograph. The blessing and curse of these otherwise excellent AI tools is that they no longer differentiate between noise reduction and sharpening, but now always attempt to sharpen sharp areas (even when sharpening itself is switched off) and soften blurry areas. Therefore, the editor’s control is limited, and there is no way to do it just right – neither for the photographer nor for the voter. My last resort is to vote with ‘neutral’. – Aristeas (talk) 11:00, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    I made a new attempt by using less sharpening on the wings and here is the result. But I think I personally prefer the current version (less blurry wings) so I don't think I'm going to upload this one on Commons. I refer to this comment and this comment to why sharpening is unavoidable for shots of birds moving fast horizontally in flight -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:22, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Πύργος Τσικουρίου DJI 4634.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Jan 2026 at 09:46:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Aerial view of Tsikourios tower, Mani

File:Metalli konserveerimas.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Jan 2026 at 21:30:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A metal conservator at work
  •  Oppose Average composition imo. I agree with Mile in that the image would benefit from right-side cropping. While it's a nice portrait, I don't find it exceptional. It also appears slightly tilted to me, which might need to be corrected as well. It's moon (talk) 03:36, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

* Oppose ОК, Alves say react imidiately. Sometime i put cmt first. --Mile (talk) 11:36, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Support This one here is more FP than this one IMO. heylenny (talk/edits) 02:56, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    For what it's worth, I agree with you. I'd like the farmer to be just a little further back in that one, and the conservator's workshop has several visually interesting objects. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:19, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Indeed a very nice and useful photo. But honestly I receive photos of craftspeople as more authentic (and educative) if they are really at work. In this case the man looks at the photographer like thinking “OMG, when will this photo session be finally over, so that I can continue with my real work?”. The composition is OK, but, as noted by previous commenters, not outstanding; turning the lens a little bit more to the left may have substantially improved it. Therefore I really appreciate the photo as very useful documentation, but I cannot see it as one of the very best photos on Commons, sorry. – Aristeas (talk) 10:35, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Technically sound and informative, but visually restrained. The frontal viewpoint and centered composition create a static, closed image with limited narrative tension. The subject's clear awareness of the camera interrupts the sense of a genuine working moment. As documentation this works well; as an FP, it lacks the compositional or expressive distinction expected at that level. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:39, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Much better croped, did you try BW, since look old workshop. I removed O, if BW would work i could put S, maybe Alternative. --Mile (talk) 21:44, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose I was thinking: Something is missing or wrong here, but I didn't know what. Aristeas and Radomianin wrote it very well. Yann (talk) 22:01, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period ends on 26 Jan 2026 at 21:29:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

California nebula from Estonia
Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:At Tallinn 2024 196 - Church of Holy Spirit Timepiece.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Jan 2026 at 21:09:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The timepiece of the Church of Holy Spirit, Tallinn

File:At London 2026 0166 - Centre Point.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Jan 2026 at 20:58:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Looking up at Centre Point, London

File:White House (Moscow) at sunset - 2025 (3).jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Jan 2026 at 15:30:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:084 Sun setting in the Namib desert Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Jan 2026 at 14:53:19 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

084 Sun setting in the Namib desert Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

File:Memmelsdorf Seehof Zitrusbäume Orthophoto-20240526-RM-111833.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Jan 2026 at 20:48:45 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Citrus trees in the garden of Seehof Castle in Memmelsdorf near Bamberg

Jeunes filles jouant sur des hippocampes

Voting period ends on 24 Jan 2026 at 12:25:03 (UTC)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page

  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues outdoors
  •  Info Yes, I know that a picture of one of the statues was promoted as a featured picture just a few days ago. But this statue is only one part of the entire artwork, as the name suggests: "Jeunes filles..." and not "Jeune fille...". The complete artwork, created in 1964 by Édouard-Marcel Sandoz, consists of three statues located on the Quai Maria Belgia in Vevey. One of them is the central figure in the "Fontaine du jardin du rivage," and the other two are in close proximity on the shore of Lake Geneva. With this set, I want to present the complete artwork with its three "Jeunes filles jouant sur des hippocampes" (young girls playing on the hippocamps)
    Camera location46° 27′ 32.85″ N, 6° 50′ 23.55″ E Kartographer map based on OpenStreetMap.View all coordinates using: OpenStreetMapinfo

    created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 12:25, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    •  Info @ Ikan Kekek: On the other side is a very busy background, houses, people and so on (see Google maps satellite). Therefore I made no photo, and if you look in Google for pictures, all are taken from this side, I found no one from the opposite side. --Llez (talk) 09:40, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 11:07, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Oppose Not special enough to me, sorry. Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:19, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Oppose Dies sind drei sehr gute Fotos, wahrscheinlich so gut, wie es unter den Umständen (Lage der Kunstwerke, Jahres- und Tageszeit, Wetter) nur möglich war, und sie bilden eine ausgezeichnete Dokumentation. Zwei Aspekte verhindern aber meiner Meinung nach, dass sie als Set herausragend sind. Zum einen spielt bei Motiven wie diesen Statuen das Licht eine entscheidende Rolle. Leider ist das Licht, mit dem Du arbeiten musstest, nicht besonders vorteilhaft – es lässt weder das Wasser oder die Figuren strahlen noch ist es so weich und schmeichelnd, dass es harte Schatten verhindert und eine intime Nähe erzeugt; es ist irgendwo dazwischen, wie es eben leider meistens ist (alle Fotografierenden können ein Lied davon singen, fürchte ich), und daher etwas langweilig. Beim jüngst neu gekürten FP war das etwas besser, der Fotograf hatte mehr Glück und das Licht gibt seiner Aufnahme eine leichte Dramatik, die sehr gut zu der Statue passt. – Zum anderen glaube ich, dass es nahezu unmöglich ist, ein exzellentes Set mit allen drei Statuen zu fotografieren, weil die Statuen zu unterschiedlich aufgestellt sind – die zweite hat einfach eine ganz andere Umgebung. Es ist sehr gut, dass Du sie zwischen den beiden anderen pla(t)ziert hast, sodass diese sie gewissermaßen rahmen; aber leider bleibt der Hintergrund dieser mittleren Statue einfach recht unruhig und unharmonisch, er lenkt stark von der Statue ab, sodas Gesamtaufnahmen dieser Figur wohl immer fotografisch unbefriedigend bleiben. (Der Baum wäre ja gut, aber die Bänke, die beiden komischen Podeste (?) im Wasser, das Gebäude hinten führen zu einem unerfreulichen Hintergrund.) Am besten sind Licht und Hintergrund beim dritten Bild, in dem der helle Bereich im Wasser und die konzentrischen Wellen um den Sockel die Statue eher hervorheben. Das bräuchten wir auch bei den beiden anderen Aufnahmen, aber wie gesagt, ich fürchte, dass das zumindest beim mittleren Bild einfach aufgrund der örtlichen Situation schwer bis unmöglich ist. Sorry – und danke für Deine sehr guten und zur Dokumentation sehr wertvollen Bilder! – Aristeas (talk) 09:54, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Charlton House - tower detail - Jan 2026.jpg

    Voting period ends on 24 Jan 2026 at 10:25:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
    Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
    Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

    Tower on the southern facade of Charlton House, London


    Timetable (day 5 after nomination)

    Sun 18 Jan → Fri 23 Jan
Mon 19 Jan → Sat 24 Jan
Tue 20 Jan → Sun 25 Jan
Wed 21 Jan → Mon 26 Jan
Thu 22 Jan → Tue 27 Jan
Fri 23 Jan → Wed 28 Jan

    Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)

    Wed 14 Jan → Fri 23 Jan
Thu 15 Jan → Sat 24 Jan
Fri 16 Jan → Sun 25 Jan
Sat 17 Jan → Mon 26 Jan
Sun 18 Jan → Tue 27 Jan
Mon 19 Jan → Wed 28 Jan
Tue 20 Jan → Thu 29 Jan
Wed 21 Jan → Fri 30 Jan
Thu 22 Jan → Sat 31 Jan
Fri 23 Jan → Sun 01 Feb

    Closing nominations manually

    The following description explains how to close nominations manually. Normally this is not necessary, as FPCBot takes care of counting the votes, closing and archiving the nominations. When the Bot has counted the votes, a user needs to check and approve the result; everything else is done by the Bot. Therefore, the following instructions are normally only needed for delist-and-replace nominations that the Bot cannot (yet) process, and in case the Bot malfunctions. The closing can be done by any experienced user. If you need help, just ask on the FPC talk page.

    1. On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the nomination, then [edit].
      • Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
        {{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=(“yes” or “no”)|gallery=xxx|sig=~~~~}}
        (You can leave the gallery parameter blank if the image was not featured. If the nomination contains alternatives, you must add the alternative=xxx parameter with the name of the selected image between the gallery and the sig parameter. See {{FPC-results-reviewed}} for examples and more explanations.)
      • Edit the title of the nomination and add featured or not featured after the link – for example:
        === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
        becomes
        === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured ===
      • Save your edit.
    2. If it is featured:
      1. Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
      2. Add the picture to the appropriate featured picture gallery page and section. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images on Commons:Featured pictures, list to find the gallery page, and search for the correct section. (An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.)
      3. Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
        • If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the com-nom parameter. For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted in the nomination Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}} You also need the com-nom parameter if the image gets renamed.
        • If the image is already featured on another Wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the {{Assessments}} template. For instance, {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
      4. Head over to the structured data for the image and add the “Commons quality assessment” claim (P6731) “Wikimedia Commons featured picture” (Q63348049).
      5. Add the picture to the chronological archives of featured pictures. Place it at the end of the gallery using this format:
        File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Title'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|xxx}}, {{o|xxx}}, {{n|xxx}}
        • The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other entries on that page for examples. (If you want to do everything perfectly, link that number to the nomination subpage, just like FPCBot does this. It allows users to jump directly to the nomination.)
        • The Title should be replaced by the bare name of the featured picture, without the ‘File:’ or the file extension (such as .jpg .tif .svg).
        • The x in {{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}} should be replaced by the count of support, oppose, and neutral votes respectively.
        • If the nomination was a set nomination, use this format:
          File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Set: Title (Z files)'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}}
          Replace the Z in (Z files) by the count of images in the set, and use the name of the first image from the set instead of File:xxxxx.jpg and for the title.
      6. Add == FP promotion ==
        {{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the nominator. For set nominations, use:
        == Set Promoted to FP ==
        <gallery>
        File:XXXXXX.jpg
        File:XXXXXX.jpg
        </gallery>
        {{FPpromotionSet2|YYYYY}}        , using the names of the set files instead of the XXXXXX and the title of the set instead of YYYYY.
      7. Add == FP promotion ==
        {{FPpromotedUploader|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the user who has uploaded the image, if that user is not the same as the nominator.
      8. Add == FP promotion ==
        {{FPpromotedCreator|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the creator, if the author is a different Commons user than nominator and uploader.
    3. As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}-d, {{FPD}}-d and {{Withdraw}}-n nominations), you have to move the transclusion (the {{ }} and the text within those) of the nomination to the current log page.
      • To find the current log page, visit the first page of the log for this month. If the header of that page contains a link with the text “Next part of this month”, the log for this month has been split into several parts because it contains too many entries. Click on the “Next part …” link and repeat this until you reach a page where the header does not offer a “Next part …” link; that’s the last and current log page.
      • Now open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you are closing. It will be of the form: {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}} or: {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/XXXXX}}.
      • Copy that line to the bottom of the current log page and save that page. Then remove the same line from the candidate list and save that page.

    Closing a delisting nomination

    1. On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
      Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
      {{FPC-delist-results-reviewed|delist=x|keep=x|neutral=x|delisted=yes/no|sig=~~~~}}
      (for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Ensifera ensifera (22271195865).jpg)
    2. Edit the title of the delisting nomination and add delisted or not delisted after the image title; for example:
      === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
      becomes
      === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted ===
    3. Move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.
    4. If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
      1. Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
      2. Edit the picture's description as follows:
      3. Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in the chronological archive of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1–6) with (1–6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture must not be removed from the chronological archives.
    5. If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the section above. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.

    Archiving a withdrawn nomination

    If a nomination has been withdrawn by the nominator by using {{Withdraw}} or is cancelled with {{FPX}} or {{FPD}}, wait 24 hours after the nomination was last edited. If there has been no objection to the cancellation within this time, the nomination can simply be archived. Just move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates&oldid=1144464229"