Commons:Graphic Lab/Photography workshop
| Illustration Workshop | Map Workshop | Photography Workshop | Video and Sound Workshop |
Photography workshop
This workshop is part of the Graphic Lab, a project aimed at picture retouching to improve the graphical content of the Wikimedia projects. More information about the lab can be found on its main page and requests pages (Illustrations ; Photographs ; Maps ; Video and Sound). To ask questions or make a suggestions, see the talk page of the graphic lab page.
This specific page is the requests page for the Photography Workshop. Anyone can make a request for a photograph to be improved. The standard format for making a request is shown below, along with general advice, and should be followed.
Make a request
Use the following template when making a new request, replacing the examples with your image(s) and request(s):
<gallery> IMAGENAME.EXT|Description of image IMAGE#TWO.EXT|2nd image (If there is one) ETCETCETC.EXT|Don't request too many at once, though </gallery> ;Request: : Details of your request go here… --~~~~ ;Graphist opinion(s):
See also
[edit]| SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 10 days and sections whose resolved comment is older than 185 days. For the archive overview, see /Archive. The latest archive is located at /Archive/2026. | |
Clean up to improve appearance
[edit]Article(s): en:Paul Martin (illustrator) - reachable via the link in reference 201.
- Request
Hello. I am the original uploader of this image. I still have the original magazine. I would like to avoid any alterations that would require a new file name. Please tweak this image to make it more presentable. Notice how there is a bluish tint or something in the lower-third left section, for instance. The background should be more naturally uniform. I'd appreciate just some touch-ups to improve the overall quality without creating a new file name. That might mean improving the focus and coloring and removing any glare area. I attempted to improve the image with my basic image editor on May 2, 2025 (under "File history"). However, I seemed to give it an artificial glitter appearance instead. Update. I increased size and tried again w/o success on 7/5.
- Graphist opinion(s)
- Hi JimPercy, I strongly recommend rephotographing if that’s possible. Ideally use a bright sunny room during the day, but set the magazine as far away from the windows and direct sunlight as possible. Turn indoor lights off (if using natural light); we don’t want mixed lighting sources that have differing colours. Zoom your lens in, step back and set your shutter speed to 1/100 or higher. Take the photo without cropping in the outside edge of the magazine, and we can crop digitally. HTGS (talk) 18:50, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Touchup for old photo
[edit]-
Portrait photograph of Simón Radowitzky in 1908
Article(s): Simón Radowitzky
- Request
- This is the highest resolution version of this photo that I have been able to find. There's still some signs of the photograph's age, with scratches and fading, and the contrast leaves a bit to the imagination. If anyone here is able to give this a wee clean up, I'd really appreciate it. --Grnrchst (talk) 18:29, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- Graphist opinion(s)
I increased the contrast Auguel (talk) 13:37, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Photo perspective and cropping
[edit]-
A stained glass window from the old town hall in Eindhoven.
-
A replica of the stone bearing the date ‘1554’ from the old town hall of Eindhoven.
Article(s): nl:Oude stadhuis (Eindhoven)
- Request
- Hi! Could the photo perspectives of these two photos be enhanced (by which I mean: very sharp, straight edges) and then be cropped? Could a new, cropped version be uploaded instead of replacing it? Thanks in advance! Kind regards, --S. Perquin (talk) 13:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)
- Graphist opinion(s)
- There seems to be some barrel distortion. Is there any chance of reshooting with another lens? cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 15:24, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I only have one lens and I can't go back there easily either unless I make a new appointment to get there. 😕 Kind regards, S. Perquin (talk) 16:19, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
- No problem. They will do. How should they be cropped? To the crest for the first? The second is already as tight as feasible. cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 16:59, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
- Ideally, right up to the edges, indeed! So, in the case of the window, the white edges form the outer sides of the image. And in the case of the stone, the white edges form the outer edges. The edges of the stone could perhaps be filled with white, so that the stone is cut out very precisely. Kind regards, S. Perquin (talk) 20:12, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
- No problem. They will do. How should they be cropped? To the crest for the first? The second is already as tight as feasible. cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 16:59, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
- @S. Perquin: Both
Done. Revert if you wouldn't like. JayCubby (talk) 14:52, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
- I just noticed you preferred a crop. Whoops... JayCubby (talk) 14:54, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
- Dear JayCubby, thank you for your adjustment! However, what I meant was to crop it in such a way that it becomes slightly distorted so that it fits within the frames. So not necessarily just cutting it out, but also distorting the entire image. Do you know how to do this? I look forward to hearing from you or someone else! Kind regards, S. Perquin (talk) 16:17, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
- Oh, I see now that you made the stained glass window the way I meant it! 😄 Could you apply something similar to the stone? And then as a new image, so not overwritten. Kind regards, S. Perquin (talk) 16:19, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
- @S. Perquin, how is https://ibb.co/mCHmkgQ7 ?
- Distortion correction crops an image slightly, FYI. JayCubby (talk) 01:59, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
- Looks good! Thank you so much! Could you perhaps re-upload the two images and mention that they are derived from the two images I had uploaded? I'm not sure how to do the last part correctly! Kind regards, S. Perquin (talk) 02:18, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
- Oh, I see now that you made the stained glass window the way I meant it! 😄 Could you apply something similar to the stone? And then as a new image, so not overwritten. Kind regards, S. Perquin (talk) 16:19, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
- Dear JayCubby, thank you for your adjustment! However, what I meant was to crop it in such a way that it becomes slightly distorted so that it fits within the frames. So not necessarily just cutting it out, but also distorting the entire image. Do you know how to do this? I look forward to hearing from you or someone else! Kind regards, S. Perquin (talk) 16:17, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
- I just noticed you preferred a crop. Whoops... JayCubby (talk) 14:54, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
- I uploaded the two files myself! See File:Glas-in-loodraam van oude stadhuis Eindhoven (perspective correction).jpg and File:Replica steen '1554' van oude stadhuis Eindhoven (perspective correction).jpg. Could someone please make sure the files are labeled correctly to indicate that there are two versions of each photo, one being the original and the other having undergone perspective correction? I don't know how to do this correctly. Thank you in advance! Kind regards, S. Perquin (talk) 21:29, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
File:Hans' Millions.png
[edit]Is a restoration from File:Hans' Millions.jpg, the original has a stitch error, is possible to fix it? I am thinking a solution, Regards!!! --Ezarateesteban 20:14, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
- Here is my humble offering to fix the storage error (stored folded)File:Hans' Millions 1.jpg PaulDallas72 (talk) 23:07, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! --Ezarateesteban 23:23, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
Pianezza
[edit]-
View of Pianezza 1
-
View of Pianezza 2
-
View of Pianezza 3
Article(s):
- Request
- Hi. If possible, I would ask to "improve" one of three images. I know they are old and not very good, but for this not so small city in Italy here in commons there are no views of Pianezza. Thank you in advance. --MrKeefeJohn (talk) 20:31, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
- @MrKeefeJohn, I've improved the 2nd image. If you can request the high-res image from the archive, that would be great. I can do a lot more with the full scan. JayCubby (talk) 16:34, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
- @JayCubby: Thank you. Is it a possible to upload the improved image like a new, "indipendent" file? About your suggestion, it's a good idea, but I'm not sure to have time to do it :-( MrKeefeJohn (talk) 06:29, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
- @MrKeefeJohn, I've improved the 2nd image. If you can request the high-res image from the archive, that would be great. I can do a lot more with the full scan. JayCubby (talk) 16:34, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
- Graphist opinion(s)
Signature and hopefully identification for portrait of William James, Bishop of Durham, 1606-1617
[edit]_(14578208158).jpg/250px-The_counties_of_England%2C_their_story_and_antiquities_(1912)_(14578208158).jpg)
- Request
- Hello, can someone take a look at this file: Portrait of William James, Bishop of Durham, 1606-1617 signed by William James. A cropped version of the file for the signature would be great to add to the Category:William James (bishop) and William James. Thank you so much. Lotje (talk) 16:17, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
- Graphist opinion(s)
- I'm not a graphist, but that's not William James' signature, it's a printer's mark indicating they redrew the oil painting for a printing plate. You also didn't even link to the version with the signature, which isn't on Commons. -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 01:31, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
Watermark
[edit]-
Watermarked
Article(s): Extensive
- Request
- Kindly remove the watermarks. --JayCubby (talk) 01:31, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
- Graphist opinion(s)
Watermark
[edit]Article(s): Wikidata:Q18467969
- Request
- Kindly remove the watermark. Thank you. GualdimG (talk) 23:23, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
- Graphist opinion(s)
Cardinal Gaudencio Rosales pink tint
[edit]Article(s): en:Gaudencio Rosales
- Request
- Please apply color correction to reduce the pink tint. --P-JR (talk) 04:49, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
- Graphist opinion(s)
Remove unwanted motorcycle shadow (Agadir Souk Al Had)
[edit]-
360° panoramic view of the main gate of Souk Al Had, Agadir. The issue is an unwanted motorcycle shadow visible on the right foreground pavement.
Article(s): Agadir, Souk El Had
- Request
- Please remove the **unwanted motorcycle shadow** visible on the **right-hand side foreground pavement** of the image.
- The edit should preserve the natural stone texture and lighting consistency of the ground, without altering people, architecture, or perspective.
- No cropping is requested; only a clean retouch to eliminate the shadow artifact.
- This image is intended for encyclopedic use, so the result should remain realistic and neutral.
- Thank you. --Flaspec (talk) 12:11, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
- Massive stacking errors visible - do you have the original files? Grunpfnul (talk) 12:31, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for checking. I’m not the original uploader of the image, so unfortunately I don’t have access to the original source files.
- Massive stacking errors visible - do you have the original files? Grunpfnul (talk) 12:31, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
- For reference, the exact location corresponding to the affected foreground area can be found in **Google Maps (satellite imagery)** at the following coordinates (Street View also available):
- 30.411268, -9.579653
- This should allow precise inspection of the pavement texture and lighting conditions. Hopefully it helps with a realistic reconstruction. --Flaspec (talk) 13:43, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
- Graphist opinion(s)
Crop images and focus only on car
[edit]Article(s): it:Škoda Fabia R5/Rally2 evo
- Request
- Crop this images and focus only on car and cut others wallpapers panoramic element. Please and replace it on Wikipedia pages that's using this picture.--~2025-42931-59 (talk) 10:45, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
- Passed more 10 days, why nothing respond me? ~2026-10016-6 (talk) 21:04, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
- Remember these requests are all done by volunteers and it has been the holiday season. Maybe no one was interested in such images for work you can easily do yourself, or they were too busy. There are no deadlines here so please be patient. You can easily do this with the crop tool that you find in your preferences when you have a registered account. Check out the details given 5 posts below this one. Ww2censor (talk) 12:08, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
- Graphist opinion(s)
Watermark removal
[edit]Article(s): W:pt:Campo e Campinho
- Request
- Please kindly remove the watermark. Thank you. GualdimG (talk) 17:09, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
- Is not resolved yet. Please check. GualdimG (talk) 15:52, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
- Graphist opinion(s)
Watermark removal
[edit]Article(s): Wikidata:Q33860850
- Request
- Please kindly remove the watermark. Thank you. GualdimG (talk) 08:49, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
- Graphist opinion(s)
Chromatic aberration
[edit]-
Some strong chromatic aberration and composition issue (too much negative space)
-
chromatic aberration must be fixed. There are some with most prominent on hands
-
Not sharp, also some chromatic aberration
Article(s): [[]]
- Request
- Here are three images and the opinion about those images by reviewer for Quality Images. I have added those reviews in the caption. Kindly correct those errors --Wasiul Bahar (talk) 16:12, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
- Best to get this images right would be with to the original raw files. Work on the jpgs will get nothing out of the many raw processors magic. Grunpfnul (talk) 23:41, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
- Any way to provide raw files? Commons doesn't allow to upload raw files Wasiul Bahar (talk) 15:50, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- WeTransfer or Dropbox could be possible (yes, its a shame that commons dosn't support this :( ) Grunpfnul (talk) 15:54, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- Any way to provide raw files? Commons doesn't allow to upload raw files Wasiul Bahar (talk) 15:50, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- Best to get this images right would be with to the original raw files. Work on the jpgs will get nothing out of the many raw processors magic. Grunpfnul (talk) 23:41, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
- Graphist opinion(s)
Watermark removal
[edit]Article(s): W:Aldeia Galega da Merceana e Aldeia Gavinha
- Request
- Please would you remove the watermark? Thank you. GualdimG (talk) 21:13, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
- Graphist opinion(s)
Watermark removal
[edit]Article(s): Wikidata:Q2157974
- Request
- Please would you remove the watermark? Thank you. GualdimG (talk) 22:04, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
- Graphist opinion(s)
John Davidson (entertainer) portrait
[edit]-
John Davidson and Sally Field in 1973
Article(s): Q6228714 and en:John_Davidson_(entertainer)
- Request
- This entertainer could do with a portrait of him by himself. The commons category has many images of him with others, this seems to be the best one. ---- Deadstar (msg) 09:24, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
- You can crop a cutout by yourself with the commons cropping tool Grunpfnul (talk) 09:57, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, I tried that, but it's rather ugly with half of Sally Field and her arm around his shoulder. I was hoping someone can create a better solution. -- Deadstar (msg) 12:33, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
- You can crop a cutout by yourself with the commons cropping tool Grunpfnul (talk) 09:57, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
- Graphist opinion(s)
Watermark removal
[edit]Article(s): Wikidata:Q1366789, Wikidata:Q134532104, Wikidata:Q132188329
- Request
- Please, would you remove the watermark? Thank you. GualdimG (talk) 15:47, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
- Graphist opinion(s)
