Jump to content

User talk:Multichill

Add topic
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Latest comment: 4 days ago by Brandonrush in topic File:Pine Bluff MSA.png
Welcome to my talk page. Use it; don't send me e-mail.

I reply to messages left on my talk, on my talk page. If I left a message on your talk page, I will reply there (unless you specify otherwise).

File:CAPres1892.png

[edit]
Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:CAPres1892.png has been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/File:CAPres1892.png

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

2600:1009:B095:F851:BD9A:C36B:1FC5:F55B 02:58, 11 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

GeographBot re-creating deleted files

[edit]
Latest comment: 4 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Multichill, first of all thank you for creating and/or maintaining GeographBot, it's too bad the Geograph project seems a little stale but it's great that Commons is able to back up a lot of that important content. But anyway, I recently DR'd a few Geograph images due to UK FOP issues at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Graffiti on walls in London, but see that today the bot re-created a few of them (e.g. File:Graffiti - geograph.org.uk - 2825750.jpg). Is the bot able to check if a file's deleted and if so, not re-create it? Thanks, -Consigned (talk) 09:44, 15 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Consigned: I have Commons:Geograph Britain and Ireland/Deleted files to prevent the bot from uploading files that have been deleted before. The bot loads the list and puts the id's on a skip list. The files you mention were recently deleted so not on the list yet, now updated. So a bit of a mid-air collision. I deleted the files. Multichill (talk) 19:42, 15 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Great, thank you. -Consigned (talk) 22:49, 15 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Category:Source_categories_(flat_list)

[edit]
Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Category discussion warning

Source categories (flat list) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ македонски ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 吴语 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Adamant1 (talk) 04:25, 16 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Papua New Guinea Australia Locator.png

[edit]
Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Papua New Guinea Australia Locator.png has been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Papua New Guinea Australia Locator.png

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Elevator Vending Machine (talk) 05:47, 16 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Thailand Australia Locator.png

[edit]
Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Thailand Australia Locator.png has been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thailand Australia Locator.png

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Elevator Vending Machine (talk) 06:19, 16 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Barbados Australia Locator.png

[edit]
Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Barbados Australia Locator.png has been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Barbados Australia Locator.png

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Elevator Vending Machine (talk) 06:19, 16 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

BotMultichill adding SDC

[edit]
Latest comment: 25 days ago8 comments3 people in discussion

I see that BotMultichill is adding SDC inception to files. Where was this bot task approved? Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:27, 29 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Pi.1415926535: been doing that for years, bot was approved and flagged back in 2007. What's the problem? Multichill (talk) 22:00, 29 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Commons:Bots/Requests/BotMultichill is only for a task of transferring images from nlwiki. You need community approval for each new task. (Per COM:BOTS: Bots must not be used to carry out different tasks for which permission has not been granted. Please stop the bot until you have received approval for this task. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:27, 29 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Pi.1415926535: aren't we a bit bureaucratic here? I can do that too, bot was approved under this policy. So no, I'm not stopping it.
If there is something in need of fixing, please tell me. Otherwise, move on. Multichill (talk) 22:37, 29 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
I had a look to be sure, the bot is just emptying out the backlog in Category:Taken on missing SDC inception. It had over 400.000 entries so it might take some time to clear. Multichill (talk) 22:53, 29 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
You did not give the community any chance to weigh in about these tasks for two bots (including BotMultichillT) that are making millions of edits. It is not being bureaucratic to insist on that simple step, which has been listed on that page since 2009, long before you started any SDC tasks with the bots. Telling me to "move on" for asking you to follow a community norm is not helpful. I have blocked BotMultichill and BotMultichillT per Commons:Bots#Blocking of bots and opened a discussion here. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:05, 30 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
You blocked both bots to make your point? This is harassment. Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#BotMultichill,_BotMultichillT_and_Pi.1415926535. Multichill (talk) 07:42, 30 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hello, i would like to have my photos coordinates.
Is that possible ?
Vreoger krege nmijn photos automatisch Open Street map cooridianten. Dat gebeurt nu niet meer.
Kan de oude situatie weer hersteld worden ?
Bij wie moet ik daar voor zijn ? JakobHosp (talk) 14:59, 28 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Terraced houses on King's Square - geograph.org.uk - 8104923.jpg

[edit]
Latest comment: 3 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Goedemorgen, Deze foto is door geographbot geupload zonder SDC (en dus zonder beschrijving, bron, licentie e.d.). Ik heb wat geprobeerd toe te voegen met de hand, zeker niet volledig, dus misschien moet je er nog eens naar kijken. Groet, Lymantria (talk) 05:43, 2 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Lymantria: normaal zou een robot het oplossen, maar die is op dit moment stuk(gemaakt), zie Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#BotMultichill,_BotMultichillT_and_Pi.1415926535. Multichill (talk) 18:42, 11 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Bandera del Departamento Quetzaltenango.gif

[edit]
Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Bandera del Departamento Quetzaltenango.gif has been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bandera del Departamento Quetzaltenango.gif

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

GaelVector (talk) 18:29, 7 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Request for Removal of My Picture from Wikimedia Commons

[edit]
Latest comment: 21 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Dear Multichill, I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to request the removal of a picture that features me from your website. The file in question is available at the following link: 

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Baptiste_Nardi_in_Villa_d%27Este.png.

I am the person depicted in this image, and I do not consent to its publication or distribution. I kindly ask that you remove it from Wikimedia Commons and any associated Wikimedia projects as soon as possible.

Please let me know if you need any further information. Thank you for your understanding and assistance.

Kind regards, Baptiste Nardi 2A02:21B4:4420:2D00:1947:6B29:4CE4:A241 11:48, 24 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Was ✓ Done some time ago by someone else. Multichill (talk) 13:51, 1 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

File:Noopept structure.png

[edit]
Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Noopept structure.png has been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Noopept structure.png

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Zyirkon (talk) 15:45, 1 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Maps from Geographicus

[edit]
Latest comment: 21 days ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, I asked you a few months back to fix the license of files uploaded by your bot, but there are still not OK. It is not acceptable that an experienced user uploads so many files without a proper license. Please fix them. Thanks, Yann (talk) 09:42, 16 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Some may even not be in the public domain. Yann (talk) 09:51, 16 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Yann: I'm not feeling my work is appreciated here so I'm barely active so I probably missed your previous message. Shouting at be for a 15 year old batch upload is not helping. As Commons:Geographicus: Most maps are fairly old. I recall some more recent ones where templates got updated, but that was years ago. What seems to be the problem? Multichill (talk) 13:50, 1 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hi, I have fixed dozen of these where the license is incomplete. For a mass upload by an experienced user, I would expect better. Yann (talk) 14:08, 1 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Advies template update

[edit]
Latest comment: 21 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Multichill. Hoe kunnen we te werk gaan voor een update van het template Artwork? Er leven wat ideeën bij mij over updates zoals noodzakelijke tokens voor grafiek zoals: serie nummer binnen de oplage. (zoals 15/299), eventueel: oplage aantal, zeker wel: serietitel 2, serietitel 2 (originele taal) ook: /toelichting, ook: /Opschriften - Merken (om ze niet 'inscripties' te noemen) /opmerkingen. eventueel /Correcties voor opmerkingen over eventueel gecorrigeerde correcties verwisselingen en aanvullingen door wiki-editors. Misschien ook '/tekst in de originele taal' (voor de authentieke data set, mits correct en zo mogelijk gebaseerd op de nieuwste versie van de bron). Zelf gebruik ik het template niet graag voor grafiek, vooral door de vele genoemde problemen ermee. Ik zie het best vaak misgaan waar men als het ware twee liter info in een eenliter fles wil gieten; 'meaning gets lost in translation'. Heb je tijd voor hulp bij oplossen van dit?

Het sjabloon is beschermd en ik heb onvoldoende ervaring om het aan te passen. Van mij mag het sjabloon eventueel ook flexibeler en meer versatile voor boeken enzo. Bijvoorbeeld volgorde flexibeler of naast 'maakt deel uit van' ook tokens voor uitgever en pagina nummers. Zeker gewenst ook meer tokens voor het onderwerp: Wanneer Waar Wat Wie. Ook foto's uit albums passen misschien nog niet goed in dit template dat kennelijk aanvankelijk gemaakt werd voor unica zoals schilderijen. Hoe lang zou dit traject gaan duren? Het mag natuurlijk niet de al geplaatste templates gaan beschadigen. Wat denk je ervan? Dit gaat onder anderen over de vormgeving van de 'Description' in circa 200K files in het Rijksmuseum Prentenkabinet. Uploads Nostalgic - Zoek "RP-P" , RP-T" en "RP-F" en check de beschrijvings elementen. zoals ook nog Opgedragen aan Opgeragen door, etc. Het sjabloon is hier en daar gewoonweg te klein om al deze info correct te kunnen verplaatsen. Vooral als er ook nog eens een Omschrijving en een Toelichting: bij is. Zelf wil ik in de huidige staat van dit sjabloon het lieft de RMA beschijvingen binnen de { {'nl| } } tags gewoon compleet naar veld Description verplaatsen en dan de vier noodzakelijke velden maker, title, auteur en bron gebruiken. Dat levert wat mij betreft de meest correcte resultaten op. Sommige ontbrekende spaties daargelaten. Ook is dit stukje 'platte' (wiki-) brontekst makkelijk geheel of gedeeltelijk te kopiëren en te vertalen. Terwijl bij versnippering over kolommen en bij onzorgvuldig werken bepaalde langere zoeksequenties bv "Datering: 1871 Fysieke kenmerken: ets" soms opeens onmogelijk of niet in dezelfde query meer te vinden zijn.

Ik pleit danook eigenlijk voor een officiële richtlijn of afspraak of aanbeveling om de oorspronkelijke authentieke RMA noteringswijzen niet te beschadigen maar in tegendeel te optimaliseren voor massale aanpassingen door bots. Deze zijn zeer goed te doorzoeken om bijvoorbeeld bepaalde thema's te vinden. Een goed script zou dan ook in korte tijd vertalingen kunnen invoegen, overbodige formattering kunnen verwijderen of vervangen of optiek een tikje comprimeren (niet echt nodig voor een enkele taal: nl) etc. De standaard en de artwotk beschrijvingen zijn wel te combineren bijna naadloos is mijn ervaring, toch spelen deze problenen. Al om te beginnen : separate velden voor /maker1 /maker2 en /naar1 /naar/2 en /opdrachtgever en /verlener van permissie /herdrukken etc. Overigens: Ik snap niet hoe ik de genoemde optionele velden 1 2 en 3 moet plaatsen. Opmerking: de beschijvingspagina klopt niet, zo lijkt het: boven in het voorbeeld zijn meer tokens genoemd dan daar onder te vinden en te kopiëren zijn. Bij wie kan ik dit verzoek indienen (op de OP?) en zou je het ondersteunen? Begrijp je wat en hoe ik het bedoel? Bedankt en Groet

update 20 nov: Hi @Multichill : of is er al een goed template voor prints en printseries? Ik kwam al wel een speciale voor boekpublicaties tegen. Peli (talk) 15:03, 17 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Peli ik ben al een tijdje amper actief op Commons. Ik heb niet het idee dat mijn inspanningen hier voldoende gewaardeerd worden dus niet echt gemotiveerd om bij te dragen. Succes met je sjablonen. Multichill (talk) 13:37, 1 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Some contents have been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Seed packets

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Respectfully, Ooligan (talk) 22:27, 25 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Vlagquetzaltenango.gif

[edit]
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Vlagquetzaltenango.gif has been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vlagquetzaltenango.gif

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

GaelVector (talk) 16:44, 30 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Vlagquetzaltenango.gif

[edit]
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Vlagquetzaltenango.gif has been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vlagquetzaltenango.gif

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

GaelVector (talk) 16:44, 30 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Vlagquetzaltenango.gif

[edit]
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Vlagquetzaltenango.gif has been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vlagquetzaltenango.gif

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

GaelVector (talk) 16:45, 30 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Template Artwork

[edit]
Latest comment: 21 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hoi Multichill, ik had hier een heel vraagstuk geopend voor overleg over het template Artwork. Inmiddels heb ik ook template 'Book' gezien maar enkele van de vraagpunten zijn nog actueel. De vraag is of het template ietsje uitgebreid zou kunnen worden voor grafiek series en dergelijke. Ik hoor graag of er oplossingen zijn voor de ontbrekende velden in verband met het correct beschrijven van prenten en foto's. Beste groet. Peli (talk) 14:05, 2 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Peli ik ben al een tijdje amper actief op Commons. Ik heb niet het idee dat mijn inspanningen hier voldoende gewaardeerd worden dus ben niet echt gemotiveerd om bij te dragen. Succes met je sjablonen. Multichill (talk) 13:36, 1 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

File:Charles Brendel, Schloss Ambras Innsbruck - Erzherzogin Eleonore (1653-1697) vor einem Kruzifix kniend, Dreiviertelporträt - GG 2750 - Kunsthistorisches Museum.jpg

[edit]
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Charles Brendel, Schloss Ambras Innsbruck - Erzherzogin Eleonore (1653-1697) vor einem Kruzifix kniend, Dreiviertelporträt - GG 2750 - Kunsthistorisches Museum.jpg has been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Charles Brendel, Schloss Ambras Innsbruck - E…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ecummenic (talk) 20:50, 21 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

GeographBot uploads lacking a file page

[edit]
Latest comment: 21 days ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Hello, these files of GeographBot's lack file pages if you please could create them:

Extended content
  1. File:A493 east of Aberdovey - geograph.org.uk - 7388195.jpg
  2. File:Ayr Harbour view - geograph.org.uk - 7929018.jpg
  3. File:Building in churchyard of St Mary's Blakesley - geograph.org.uk - 7870407.jpg
  4. File:Chester sidings - geograph.org.uk - 7907141.jpg
  5. File:Collingham, St Oswald's church - geograph.org.uk - 7336250.jpg
  6. File:Culbin Forest - geograph.org.uk - 7780301.jpg
  7. File:Daffodils on Padgetts Road, Christchurch - geograph.org.uk - 7446931.jpg
  8. File:Dovecote, Barnby in the Willows - geograph.org.uk - 7776456.jpg
  9. File:East on dirt covered Stone Lane - geograph.org.uk - 7614594.jpg
  10. File:Excavated Smithy at Wheal Florence - geograph.org.uk - 7060037.jpg
  11. File:Female Pheasant (Phasianus colchicus), Loch of the Lowes - geograph.org.uk - 1786606.jpg
  12. File:Garden at Weisdale Kirk - geograph.org.uk - 1784703.jpg
  13. File:Main Street, Stow Cum Quy - geograph.org.uk - 7857853.jpg
  14. File:Minor road from the level crossing towards the A64 - geograph.org.uk - 7672907.jpg
  15. File:Mulberry Manor - geograph.org.uk - 7945358.jpg
  16. File:Nationwide Building Society advert, Crindau, Newport - geograph.org.uk - 7466177.jpg
  17. File:Netherskaill Farm - geograph.org.uk - 7776468.jpg
  18. File:Neville Road after a shower - geograph.org.uk - 7746116.jpg
  19. File:North aisle in St Nicholas - geograph.org.uk - 8109811.jpg
  20. File:Path and Sign at Beacon Hill Wood - geograph.org.uk - 7362423.jpg
  21. File:Peebles Swimming Pool - geograph.org.uk - 7883693.jpg
  22. File:Piles of colourful Fish boxes and Houses at Yellowcraig Dunbar - geograph.org.uk - 8031003.jpg
  23. File:Ripon Town Hall - geograph.org.uk - 7820572.jpg
  24. File:Road Sign, Inveraray, Argyll - geograph.org.uk - 7924186.jpg
  25. File:The New Drum - geograph.org.uk - 7525153.jpg
  26. File:The River Barrow at Carlow - geograph.org.uk - 7933152.jpg
  27. File:The lochs of North Uist - geograph.org.uk - 8168155.jpg
  28. File:Thomas Steers Way, Liverpool - geograph.org.uk - 7703199.jpg

Jonteemil (talk) 23:44, 27 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Jonteemil: the bot cleaning that up (User:BotMultichillT) is blocked. Bot will resume if someone unblocks it. Multichill (talk) 13:29, 1 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
I see. I assume you then have to create a request at COM:BRFA. Jonteemil (talk) 17:28, 1 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Jonteemil: Since there weren't very many of them, I've manually copied the description pages from Geograph for these 28 files, and also added some categories. --bjh21 (talk) 22:50, 1 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

User:GeographBot uploads of Commons:Derivative works from advertisements

[edit]
Latest comment: 21 days ago3 comments2 people in discussion

A lot of User:GeographBot uploads in Category:Aylesbury were Commons:Derivative works from advertisement and file names contained advert (for example, File:Asahi advert - geograph.org.uk - 7739543.jpg, I deleted ~ 250 similar files already). Could you please blacklist such files for future uploads (human review must be required) and also review files already uploaded on Commons? EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 28 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

176 files were deleted today. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:26, 29 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Looks like geograph user melodie is the source of these adverts around Aylesbury. I deleted the remaining advert photos by this user.
See also Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#User:GeographBot_uploads_of_Commons:Derivative_works_from_advertisements. Multichill (talk) 13:27, 1 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

File:Jean-Étienne Liotard (1702-1789) - Louise Elizabeth, Madame Infanta - PD.56-2005 - Fitzwilliam Museum.jpg

[edit]
Latest comment: 19 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Jean-Étienne Liotard (1702-1789) - Louise Elizabeth, Madame Infanta - PD.56-2005 - Fitzwilliam Museum.jpg has been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jean-Étienne Liotard (1702-1789) - Louise Eli…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ecummenic (talk) 20:03, 3 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

File:Arthur Hughes (1832-1915) - The Rift within the Lute - 1949.125.23 - The Tullie.jpg

[edit]
Latest comment: 19 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Phillipedison1891 (talk) 21:55, 3 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

File:Arthur Hughes (1832-1915) - Home from Sea - WA1907.3 - Ashmolean Museum.jpg

[edit]
Latest comment: 19 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Arthur Hughes (1832-1915) - Home from Sea - WA1907.3 - Ashmolean Museum.jpg has been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arthur Hughes (1832-1915) - Home from Sea - W…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Phillipedison1891 (talk) 22:13, 3 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

File:Arthur Hughes (1832-1915) - In the Grass - VIS.3 - Sheffield Galleries and Museums Trust.jpg

[edit]
Latest comment: 19 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Arthur Hughes (1832-1915) - In the Grass - VIS.3 - Sheffield Galleries and Museums Trust.jpg has been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arthur Hughes (1832-1915) - In the Grass - VI…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Phillipedison1891 (talk) 22:18, 3 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

File:Arthur Hughes (1832-1915) - Sir Galahad, the Quest for the Holy Grail - WAG 2936 - Walker Art Gallery.jpg

[edit]
Latest comment: 19 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Phillipedison1891 (talk) 02:52, 4 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

File:Arthur Hughes (1832-1915) - The Potter's Courtship - TWCMS , B8146 - Laing Art Gallery.jpg

[edit]
Latest comment: 19 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Phillipedison1891 (talk) 02:55, 4 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

File:Pine Bluff MSA.png

[edit]
Latest comment: 4 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Pine Bluff MSA.png has been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pine Bluff MSA.png

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Brandonrush (talk) 17:42, 18 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Multichill&oldid=1149399337"