User talk:PantheraLeo1359531

Archiv 0 | Archiv 2020 | Archiv 2021 | Archiv 2022 | Archiv 2023 | Archiv 2024 | Archiv 2025

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, PantheraLeo1359531!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Hofer Weihnachtsmarkt 20251219 HOF3439 RAW-Export (cropped).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hofer Weihnachtsmarkt 20251219 HOF3439 RAW-Export.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (02 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Untreusee 20251230 HOF4130-HDR RAW-Export CORR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 20:37, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Untreusee 20251230 HOF4108-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 20:37, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Untreusee 20251230 HOF4072-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:57, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (04 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feuerwerk in Feilitzsch 20260101 HOF4233 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 18:27, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feuerwerk in Feilitzsch 20260101 HOF4262 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:36, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feuerwerk in Feilitzsch 20260101 HOF4256 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --DimiTalen 17:20, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feuerwerk in Feilitzsch 20260101 HOF4265 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:38, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (05 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Egerstausee im Egertal 20251227 HOF3960 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Egerstausee im Egertal 20251227 HOF3983 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NSG Egertal 20251227 HOF3984 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (06 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Egerstausee im Egertal 20251227 HOF3977 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:55, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Curator feedback

Hey 👋 I've a question for you. Are you using the app in multiple tabs at the same time? -- DaxServer (talk) 19:31, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

@DaxServer Hi! Not as I can remember :(. In very few cases, I have an uploading batch and trigger a retry in another batch to retry 2 or 3 failing files, but that's all actually. --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:32, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

I made some changes, this time it could be more reliable than the last couple of days 🙈 -- DaxServer (talk) 10:49, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your tireless work, I can check it :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 12:05, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

I made some more changes, let's give another try 🙈 -- DaxServer (talk) 15:22, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

@DaxServerIt seems it is running again, thank you🥺--PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:32, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Happy to help :)

I just noticed pattern of the numbers in your username, I think it's cool! -- DaxServer (talk) 19:46, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Yeah, it is a palindrome, that contains an equation: 1+3+5=9=5+3+1 ;) (although I saw the equation after the naming :D ) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 20:30, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

@DaxServer Hi! I tested a larger batch with 6490 files l1QCIHNgZvYUfjRse09ybX (Batch #466). Unfortunately, we get the following error:

Server error '500 Internal Server Error' for url 'https://graph.mapillary.com/images?access_token=MLY%7C32349865367990972%7Cc0719f161a43af80d254e0fdbb61215e&sequence_ids=l1QCIHNgZvYUfjRse09ybX&fields=captured_at%2Ccompass_angle%2Ccreator%2Cgeometry%2Cheight%2Cis_pano%2Cmake%2Cmodel%2Cthumb_256_url%2Cthumb_1024_url%2Cthumb_original_url%2Cwidth' For more information check: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Status/500

(https://curator.toolforge.org/#/batches/466). --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:59, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

PS: Do we already have a function to stop executing batches? --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 15:01, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

I'm looking into the error. There's no function, but I can do a quick hack and set them all as failed, so that they will not be processed. That's a good idea, I'll put that as a feature! Perhaps, can you file a task in Phabricator so we can track that? -- DaxServer (talk) 15:33, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

@DaxServer

Tracked in Phabricator
Task T413392

 Done I filed one :). I also created a category Category:Curator (Wikibot). There I can put files into to do a tutorial for example, for new users :). --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 15:39, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Hey, due to a bug, the batch 467 uploaded 827 files under different titles. The bug is fixed but before re-triggering the batch, the files either need to be renamed to their supposed titles - that seems like the easiest solution to me. If you have other ideas, let me know. -- DaxServer (talk) 22:16, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Actually, looking at the database, it seems 841 of the 6490 files have distinct titles and thus the remaining are failing. It seems they are just genuinely duplicates. The app should also show this error to the user and should only accept different upload titles and images. Seems like the next work item is already in queue for me 😅 -- DaxServer (talk) 22:48, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

@DaxServer It was my fault. The problem is that within one second, several images were taken. I forgot the millisecond parameter in this batch. This is why several files were upload to one filename (549230880699800 and 1687894271665497 were uploaded to "Mapillary (6QhgUkS1vHDp4WfOlVdBT3) (bct) 2023-03-20 17H58M17S.jpg", for example. :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 09:52, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Maybe we can include parameters like millisecond in the standard template (following by the image ID or so) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 09:53, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Bayerische Vermessungsverwaltung - DOP - 543000 5269000 (2003).tif

File:Bayerische Vermessungsverwaltung - DOP - 543000 5269000 (2003).tif has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bayerische Vermessungsverwaltung - DOP - 5430… This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Berlinschneid (talk) 20:49, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (08 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grundschule Krötenbruck im Winter 20251230 HOF4186-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:35, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naturschutzgebiet Egertal 20251227 HOF3915-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Very nice scene. --Augustgeyler 18:44, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naturschutzgebiet Egertal 20251227 HOF3933-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 23:54, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naturschutzgebiet Egertal 20251227 HOF3945-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 18:44, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (09 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grundschule Krötenbruck im Winter 20251230 HOF4186-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:35, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naturschutzgebiet Egertal 20251227 HOF3915-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Very nice scene. --Augustgeyler 18:44, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naturschutzgebiet Egertal 20251227 HOF3933-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 23:54, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naturschutzgebiet Egertal 20251227 HOF3945-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 18:44, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (10 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carolinenquelle, Hohenberg an der Eger 20251227 HOF3717 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CA (purple fringes). Also not sure about the white balance. --Plozessor 03:20, 30 December 2025 (UTC)  Done Thanks, done --PantheraLeo1359531 15:50, 6 January 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:29, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hutschenreuther-Infotafel in Hohenberg an der Eger 20251227 HOF3788 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CA (purple fringes) on the top and left side. --Plozessor 03:19, 30 December 2025 (UTC)  Done Thanks, done --PantheraLeo1359531 15:50, 6 January 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:29, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:49, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (12 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Egerstausee im Egertal 20251227 HOF3967 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romzig 21:45, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feuerwerk in Feilitzsch 20260101 HOF4239 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:09, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:47, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Meine Sortierung der Mapillary-Uploads & Dank

Lieber PantheraLeo1359531, ich hoffe, es ist okay, wenn ich das hier kurz erkläre - auch der Transparenz halber. Wir hatten ja schon ein paar nette Berührungspunkte auf Commons, deshalb schreibe ich dir einfach offen :)

In den vergangenen Wochen habe ich mich immer wieder mit der Sortierung sehr voller "Photographs taken on …"-Kategorien beschäftigt. Dabei bin ich regelmäßig auf größere Mengen der von dir auf Commons importierten Mapillary-Bilder gestoßen, die aufgrund des {{Taken on}}-Templates gesammelt in den Tages-Hauptkategorien gelandet waren.

Um diese Kategorien etwas zu entlasten, habe ich die Dateien jeweils auf Dateiebene in passende regionale Unterkategorien (z.B. Bavaria, Germany, United States usw.) einsortiert. Das war eher eine pragmatische Aufräumarbeit im Rahmen der allgemeinen Kategoriesortierung, nicht ein gezielter Eingriff in deine Uploads.

Erst heute ist mir klar geworden, dass sich das Ganze deutlich eleganter und nachhaltiger lösen lässt, nämlich auf Kategorieebene: also cat=no im Taken-on-Template und dafür eine passende regionale "… photographs taken on …"-Kategorie, direkt in der jeweiligen Mapillary-Kategorie. So hätte man sich viele Einzelverschiebungen auf Dateiebene sparen können - dein späteres Vorgehen in diese Richtung ist daher absolut sinnvoll.

Manche Uploads hatten ja bereits eigene Subkategorien, z.B. "United States". Dadurch landen die Dateien aktuell sowohl in der Unterkategorie "United States photographs taken on …" als auch in der Hauptkategorie "Photographs taken on …". Das ist technisch korrekt, kann aber zu einer leichten Überkategorisierung führen. In solchen Fällen werde ich zukünftig einfach das Template-Parameter cat=no setzen - dann verschwinden die Dateien aus der obersten Ebene, bleiben aber sauber in der Unterkategorie erhalten.

Falls dir künftig wieder einmal eine Mapillary-Kategorie auffällt, bei der noch meine alten Dateikategorisierungen vorhanden sind oder eine Überkategorisierung entstehen könnte, sag mir einfach kurz Bescheid. Ich kann dann gesammelt über das Visual File Change Tool die Location-Parameter zurücknehmen und stattdessen cat=no setzen. Alternativ kannst du das natürlich auch selbst anpassen - mir geht es dabei vor allem um eine saubere und langfristig gut wartbare Struktur.

Ganz unabhängig davon möchte ich dir wirklich danken: Deine Mapillary-Importe finde ich großartig. Es ist fantastisch, dass wir auf Commons so eine frei lizenzierte, weltweit verfügbare "Street-View"-ähnliche Dokumentation haben. Das ist für mich eine absolute Bereicherung - und es macht Freude zu sehen, wie liebevoll und aufmerksam du diese Uploads betreust. Vielen Dank, dass du dir die Mühe machst und damit Commons auf so besondere Weise bereicherst :)

Ganz herzliche Grüße, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:21, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Hallo @Radomianin, herzlichen Dank für deine lieben Worte :D. Ja, das ist ein wichtiger Punkt, den du da ansprichst. Jeder Upload über das Curator-Uploadtool, das der sehr fleißige User DaxServer geschrieben hat, kategorisiert die Dateien schon automatisch ein (Photographs taken on YYYY-MM-DD). Ich kann gerne vorschlagen, eine Funktion einzubauen, die die automatische Kategorisierung überschreibt, wenn konkrete Kategorieangaben vorhanden sind. Den Templateparameter gucke ich mir gerne an, vielleicht kann ich das gleich so mit übernehmen :).

Ich melde mich, falls ich etwas Entsprehendes finde.

Danke für die netten Worte :D. Ich bin tatsächlich auch erst 2025 auf Mapillary gestoßen und war verblüfft von der Fülle an Bildern (ca. 3 Mrd. oder so?) :). Zu Beginn musste ich das Bildmaterial noch mit einem Python-Skript herunterladen und auf Commons wieder hochladen, das war etwas aufwendig. Aber mit dem neuen Tool geht das deutlich besser.

Ich hoffe, dass das Tool bald von etlichen Usern genutzt wird, um eine systematische Erfassung vieler bedeutsamer Orte zu erreichen. Ich fokussiere mich neben persönlichen Interessen auf gefährdete, besondere oder zerstörte Orte wie Nordkorea, Grönland, Gaza, Lahaina, Ahrtal, oder den ehemaligen Bereich vom Tagebau Garzweiler.

Ich habe auch das Gefühl, dass das Bewusstsein wächst, dass auch digitale Dateien gefährdet sind, das möchte ich auch abdecken, aber es gibt noch viel zu tun :).

Falls dir noch irgendwas auffällt, sage mir bitte Bescheid, dann gucke ich rein. Manche Strukturen kristallisieren sich auch später heraus, und bei mehreren Hunderttausend bis Millionen Dateien verliert man dann den Überblick :D. Schön, dass du dabei bist und liebe Grüße!

PS: Ich habe mir auch paar Gedanken zu den Meinungsbildern der FPCs aus Mödlareuth gemacht. Das Foto vom Grenzpfeiler empfand ich zunächst zu schlicht, aber vielleicht ist genau das in Verbindung mit der Symbolträchtigkeit umso bedeutsamer :). Ich arbeite mal potenzielle Kandidaten Stück für Stück ab und mal sehen, was dabei herauskommt. --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 09:58, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Addendum: Bemerkenswert und nachvollziehbar ist auch die Tatsache, dass bspw. keine Bilder der Ukraine aufrufbar sind. Das ist schade für Orte um Tschernobyl, aber natürlich auch aus sicherheitsrelevanten Gründen nachvollziehbar --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 10:00, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

• Lieber PantheraLeo1359531, vielen Dank für deine ausführliche und offene Antwort - das freut mich wirklich sehr zu lesen :) Deine Erläuterungen zum Curator-Uploadtool und zur automatischen Tageskategorisierung sind absolut nachvollziehbar. Genau an dieser Schnittstelle bin ich bei meinen Aufräumarbeiten in den übervollen "Photographs taken on …"-Kategorien immer wieder über größere Mengen Mapillary-Dateien gestolpert - daher auch mein pragmatisches Vorgehen auf Dateiebene in den vergangenen Wochen.

Daß du überlegst, im Tool selbst eine Logik einbauen zu lassen, die vorhandene konkrete Kategorien berücksichtigt bzw. die Tageskategorie mit dem Parameter |cat=no überschreibt, fände ich sehr gut. Das wäre aus meiner Sicht tatsächlich eine sehr elegante Lösung für größere Mengen an Dateien.

Für bereits von mir vorgenommene Dateikategorisierungen gilt: Falls du künftig in Mapillary-Kategorien zusätzliche regionale Unterkategorien (z.B. Bavaria, Germany, United States etc.) ergänzt und dir dabei auffällt, daß ich früher schon auf Dateiebene eingegriffen habe, sag mir gerne kurz Bescheid. Ich kann dann gezielt prüfen und - wo sinnvoll - gesammelt auf |cat=no im {{Taken on}}-Template umstellen, um Überkategorisierungen zu vermeiden. Bei kleineren Mengen ist das aus meiner Sicht unkritisch, bei mehreren tausend Dateien lohnt sich die saubere Lösung auf Kategorieebene aber sehr. In diesem Bearbeitungsbeispiel meines gestrigen VFC-Batches war die Datei bereits beim Upload korrekt der Kategorie "United States photographs taken on …" zugeordnet. Um eine Überkategorisierung in der übergeordneten Tageskategorie zu vermeiden, habe ich daher lediglich den Parameter |cat=no im {{Taken on}}-Template ergänzt.

Deine inhaltliche Motivation finde ich übrigens ausgesprochen stark. Der Fokus auf gefährdete, besondere oder zerstörte Orte - und auch der Gedanke, daß selbst digitale Bilder als Zeitdokumente gefährdet sein können - trifft bei mir einen Nerv. Daß bestimmte Regionen wie die Ukraine aktuell fehlen, ist traurig, aber natürlich verständlich. Umso wertvoller sind andere schwer zugängliche oder selten dokumentierte Orte. Wer weiß, vielleicht tauchen ja irgendwann sogar Mapillary-Aufnahmen aus der Antarktis oder ähnlichen Regionen auf.

Und ganz nebenbei: Danke auch für deine Gedanken zu den geplanten FP-Kandidaten aus Mödlareuth. Gerade bei solchen Motiven liegt für mich die Stärke oft in der Schlichtheit und Symbolik - schön, daß du dich damit so aufmerksam auseinandersetzt.

Danke dir für dein Engagement und den freundlichen Austausch - und melde dich jederzeit, wenn ich irgendwo unterstützen oder etwas erklären kann. Herzliche Grüße, -- Radomianin (talk) 10:50, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

@Radomianin

Perfekt, dann mache ich das so :). Übergangsweise werde ich wahrscheinlich erst die Dateien hochladen, und sobald ein Batch fertig ist, via VFC den Parameter setzen, bis die Funktion implementiert ist. Gegenwärtig dürften wir noch wenige Batches haben, die mehr als 1000 Dateien umfassen, da diese Funktion relativ frisch ist, also müssten da wenige Elemente betroffen sein.

Die Antarktis dürfte in geringen Teilen auch bereits Inhalte haben, ich kann sie gerne zeitnah hochladen :). Tatsächlich lässt sich das Bewusstsein für gefährdete Inhalte auch grafisch darstellen: File:Unique data of the Internet Archive 20260105.svg und File:Zuwachs der Datenmenge auf Commons pro Jahr in Terabyte 20250322.svg. Die 2020er sind enorme Zugpferde. Auch Leute wie das Archive Team sichern wie verrückt.

Große Herausforderungen werden Plattformen wie Google (Maps) oder Instagram sein, die nicht so einfach zu sichern sind (Crawling wird mit Sperren versehen, und automatisierte Prozesse streng überwacht), aber leider auch sehr viel wichtige Bilder haben... Meine Heimatstadt hat mir auch bereits geschrieben, dass sie ihre auf Social Media veröffentlichten Inhalte extra noch mal archivieren möchten; das ist dringend nötig (siehe Datensouveränität). Ich danke Dir und werde bei Gelegenheit auf Dich zukommen ;)

Liebe Grüße --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 12:14, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Gott sei Dank ist die bloße Speicherkapazität nicht mehr so das Problem, da lassen sich relativ gut machbar einige Petabyte sichern --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 12:15, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

• Lieber PantheraLeo1359531, vielen Dank für deine durchdachte Rückmeldung - das liest sich wirklich gut und macht Freude. Dein vorgeschlagenes Vorgehen klingt absolut sinnvoll. Übergangsweise nach einem Batch via VFC den Parameter zu setzen, ist aus meiner Sicht ein sehr guter und pragmatischer Weg, bis die Funktion ggf. direkt im Upload-Tool greift. Gerade jetzt, wo die größeren Batches noch überschaubar sind, lässt sich das gut handhaben.

Gerade eben habe ich ein konkretes Beispiel umgesetzt: Bei der Kategorie Photographs of Tiraspol from Mapillary (…) habe ich bei 401 Dateien das Parameter |cat=no im {{Taken on}}-Template ergänzt, da die Kategorie bereits korrekt in der Länderkategorie Moldova photographs taken on … lag, aber die Fotos zusätzlich noch in der Hauptkategorie Photographs taken on … erschienen sind. Genau hier zeigt sich, wie hilfreich es ist, das Thema frühzeitig mitzudenken, um unnötige Überkategorisierungen zu vermeiden. Ich finde es sehr gut, daß wir das jetzt offen besprechen und sich das |cat=no-Parameter perspektivisch bereits während der Upload-Batches berücksichtigen lässt - das erspart später viel Aufräumarbeit und sorgt für eine langfristig saubere Struktur.

Auch deine Gedanken zu gefährdeten digitalen Inhalten und den Grafiken finde ich extrem spannend. Gerade Plattformen wie Google Maps oder Instagram sind in dieser Hinsicht echte Sorgenkinder, obwohl dort so viel zeitgeschichtlich relevantes Material liegt. Umso wichtiger ist das, was du hier auf Commons aufbaust. Danke dir für den offenen Austausch und dein Vertrauen - und sehr gerne, melde dich jederzeit. Ich bin froh, daß wir hier gemeinsam an einer guten Lösung arbeiten :) Herzliche Grüße, -- Radomianin (talk) 12:48, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

@Radomianin Perfekt! Gut, dass du so zeitnah auf mich zugekommen bist, da lässt sich das Thema schnell korrigieren :). Zumindest mit dem Bewusstsein um die Gefährdung sind wir schon einen Schritt weiter.

Ich weiß, dass zumindest einige Instagram-Inhalte schon massenarchiviert werden; bei Google Maps fehlen leider noch gute Programme, die das automatisiert können, jedoch gibt es Programme/Skripte, die massenhaft Street View-Panoramen herunterladen können. Wenn es sich gut entwickelt, können wir vielleicht in 5–10 Jahren gute Entwicklungen sehen, die wir noch nicht abschätzen können.

Wichtig ist eben, den Leuten zu zeigen, was es für Möglichkeiten gibt und warum das wichtig ist.

Laut Serverabfrage entfallen auf mein Konto etwa 2,5 Mio. Uploads bei knapp 150 TB und da denke ich auch manchmal, ob das nicht etwas viel ist, allerdings bilden ein Großteil hochqualitative Inhalte wie Luftbilder, Kartenmaterial oder eben Straßenfotos von Mapillary und die WMF sollte solche Datenmengen auch noch verarbeiten können (bei der Sammelleidenschaft muss man sich auch stets überprüfen, ob die Inhalte brauchbar genug sind). Kritisch könnte es erst bei mehreren Petabyte sein, wenn sie sich ziemlich schnell ergießen könnten. Mir fällt übrigens auch noch mindestens ein Nutzer auf Commons ein, der sich um Langzeitarchivierung Gedanken macht. Ein sogenannter "Longtermist" :). Also wir sind nicht alleine. Liebe Grüße --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 12:58, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

• Lieber PantheraLeo1359531, danke dir - das freut mich sehr zu lesen :) Gut zu wissen, daß wir da in dieselbe Richtung denken. Allein das gemeinsame Bewusstsein für diese Themen ist schon ein großer Schritt. Die Zahlen sind beeindruckend, aber gerade bei der Qualität und Relevanz der Inhalte sehe ich das entspannt - genau dafür ist Commons ja da. Und schön zu wissen, daß wir mit den Langzeitgedanken nicht alleine sind ;) Danke für den offenen Austausch und bis bald – ich melde mich, wenn mir wieder etwas auffällt. Herzlich, -- Radomianin (talk) 13:08, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

  Alles Gute, bis dahin :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:49, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (15 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sigmundsgraben 24 20251219 HOF3054 RAW-Export cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:18, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (16 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gehöft Haag 20251213 HOF2856 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 21:42, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mautstation am Felbertauerntunnel 20180819 DSC01830 RAW-Export cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:53, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (17 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Umgebung der Carolinenquelle, Hohenberg an der Eger 20251227 HOF3760 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The same as the neighbour image: multiple CA (purple fringes), also WB issues. --Екатерина Борисова 03:15, 31 December 2025 (UTC)  Done Thanks, done --PantheraLeo1359531 15:50, 6 January 2026 (UTC) Purple fringes have become less bright, but they are still visible. I don't think that it's QI, sorry Maybe someone else has other opinion. --Екатерина Борисова 01:45, 8 January 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality for me --Юрий Д.К. 16:32, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:55, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (19 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ortsschild Hof bei Hopfgarten in Defereggen 22082018 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aciarium 10:59, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-08-22 Hopfgarten in Defereggen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aciarium 11:04, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (21 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-18 Abriss der Stadtbibliothek Naila HOF5121 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:27, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-18 Abriss der Stadtbibliothek Naila HOF5134-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:27, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-18 Weststraße 1, Sparkasse HOF5359-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:27, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-18 Jugendtreff JuNaited HOF5355 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:27, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:47, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (22 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-19 Theater Hof im Winter HOF5504 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 19:12, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-19 Theater Hof im Winter HOF5500 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:49, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-19 Freizeitanlage Bahnhof Neuhof HOF5568 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Very detailed panorama. --Augustgeyler 19:17, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2026-01-19 Ballerina von Otmar Alt am Theater Hof HOF5480 RAW-Export cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 19:12, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 22 January 2026 (UTC)