Jump to content

User talk:Yann

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Latest comment: 16 hours ago by GAllegre in topic A propos de File:Rainbowfish scale.jpg

/archives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 6364 65 66 67

God is busy, may I help you? / Dieu est occupé, puis-je vous aider?

You can leave me a message in English or French, at the bottom. Click here. Yann 22:13, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

File:Logan-ScottBowden 2825603b.jpg.

Hi Yann. Thank you for your message on my talk page concerning this image. I'm afraid I'm rather new to this but believe the image falls under non-free usage rationale. I did provide a source address for the image. I'd really appreciate some help, if you can spare the time, to make the image compliant with the Wiki. Leitrim Lad (talk) 14:11, 8 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Leitrim Lad: Hi, OK, but fair use is not allowed on Commons. It should be uploaded locally on the English Wikipedia (or any other project which accepts fair use). Yann (talk) 14:20, 8 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
ah, ok - than k you. I'll try to suss that out. Leitrim Lad (talk) 16:28, 9 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Protection for Category:Other speedy deletions

Hello Yann, I think the edit and move protection for Category:Other speedy deletions was removed when you deleted and undeleted the page. Can you please add them back to the page? Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 20:18, 8 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

✓ Done Semi-protected again. Yann (talk) 20:30, 8 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Copyvios

Hi

Episodes from Super Bigote here, seems to be a licence washing, because the YT account is not the TV or the producer. And files from Category:Ali Mohsen al-Ahmar are all copyrighted. Panam2014 (talk) 19:33, 9 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Panam2014: Hi, Please create deletion requests. Thanks, Yann (talk) 19:35, 9 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Okay. Is it possible to ask for a speedy deletion while the proofs are enough? Panam2014 (talk) 19:36, 9 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Panam2014: I think a regular DR is better here. Yann (talk) 19:41, 9 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Done. Panam2014 (talk) 20:19, 9 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Unblock User:Gaty3000

It's been two weeks since Gaty was blocked. Maybe we can consider unblocking them now? 0x0a (talk) 09:40, 10 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

OK, done. Yann (talk) 10:03, 10 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Yann just for clarification, per this thread at COM:ANU, Artur2077 was the new account of Gaty3000. So are we allowing a person to use two (illegitimate, since the second creation would be block evasion) accounts simultaneously? Shaan SenguptaTalk 05:14, 11 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
OK, I blocked the sock. Yann (talk) 10:12, 11 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Drone show images by PIB

Hi @Yann, can you plz help me with whether I can upload the drone show images released by PIB here. Although the event was sponsored by the govt and the images are clicked by a govt photographer, this particular show was maybe performed by some private agency. Images on PIB website are generally under GODL but there is the third party clause. The permission to reproduce this material shall not extend to any third-party material. Authorisation to reproduce such material must be obtained from the departments/copyright holders concerned. Shaan SenguptaTalk 05:31, 11 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Shaan Sengupta: Hi, I don't know more than you, but your analysis shows that these drone images are probably not OK. Yann (talk) 10:13, 11 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Exactly how I thought, bcoz the drone show is probably considered an artistic work of that agency and therefore the images are under GODL but not the drone show visuals. Thank you so much for your help. Shaan SenguptaTalk 10:59, 11 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

File:Arrest of Nicolás Maduro.jpg

File:Arrest of Nicolás Maduro.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

cyrfaw (talk) 18:16, 11 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

The Resilient Barnstar
Thank you for the recent messages regarding AI on the file that I nominated for deletion last night. I will take these into account before thinking twice. cyrfaw (talk) 11:15, 12 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Files by Leyna Amly

Bonsoir Yann,

merci d'avoir restauré les fichiers et d'avoir aussi pensé à la notoriété. Restaurer et demander tout de suite la suppression, c'est la bonne façon de faire. J'ai ajouté le module de permission et j'ai écrit à la photographe qu'elle pouvait présenter son argument dans la discussion sur la suppression. Dans un autre cas il y a quelques semaines, la personne concernée a pu prouver sa notoriété.

On verra bien. ;-)

Bonne soirée, bien cordialement du nord de l'Allemagne, Mussklprozz (talk) 19:53, 12 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cat facing viewer 3.jpg

Hey! Can you please explain your decision? Thanks Lukas Beck (talk) 21:00, 12 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

@L. Beck: I deleted it as CSD F10 (personal photos of or by non-contributors) (as it was tagged by Alachuckthebuck). Additionally, this is of poor quality, and has no EXIF data. Yann (talk) 22:06, 12 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Where is a picture of a cat a personal photo? The image can certainly be deleted due to poor quality, but not via speedy deletion, rather through a regular deletion request. Lukas Beck (talk) 05:46, 13 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
OK. Yann (talk) 08:37, 13 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ivan Vajsov--2007 Schloshof.jpg

Kept, with your support, then deleted by you. What changed? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:34, 14 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Ikan Kekek: Hi, OK, I undeleted it along with File:Ivan Vajsov (2).jpg. But I think there are several issues: the author is Roman Haљинk, not Ivan Vajso. It is very unlikely to be a selfie, so permission is usually required. I could accept the argument of "taken by a passer-by", but EXIF data of files by this user are inconsistent. As shown in File:Durankulak-ceramic 24-VII (HIV).jpg, his camera is a Canon EOS M, not Canon PowerShot S70. A lot of files are claimed as "own work" which are doubtfully so. And he is using two accounts: 1926Bubi57 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log. Yann (talk) 09:26, 14 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
It sounds like there are good reasons to delete. Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:28, 14 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour, Il s'agit d'une copie d'un acte de naissance établie par le registre civil le 3 mars 1906 à Sodingen, Allemagne, aujourd'hui cette municipalité fait partie de la Ville de Herne. La personne mentionnée sur l'acte de naissance est décédée en 1947. Pourquoi est-ce vous avez proposé ce document pour effacement? Meilleures salutations Kbamert (talk) 08:44, 15 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Kbamert: Bonjour, Il n'y avait pas de licence. J'ai vu que vous aviez corrigé cela, donc tout va bien. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 10:10, 15 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
merci pour votre intervention - cela m'a permis de sécuriser ce document doublement (German copyrigh law, loi sur les documents officiels) déjà mis et encore US copyright law (la règle des 95 ans) (il semble que les serveurs de wikimedia commons se trouvent aux Etats-Unis (c'est pour cela qu'entre en jeu le (US copyright law) et, en conséquence, comprendre mieux les lois de protection en vigueur pour ce document et sa situation sur des serveurs (USA). Kbamert (talk) 10:34, 15 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Restoring File:Commissioner Albert P Dela Cruz.jpg

Hello, this file was recently deleted. I would like to request its restoration as it is an official portrait from a Philippine government website (climate.gov.ph). Under Republic Act No. 8293, Section 176, Philippine government works are in the public domain. I have the source link ready and will ensure the {{PD-PhilippinesGov}} tag is correctly applied. Thank you. EcoSaver123 (talk) 04:27, 16 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

@EcoSaver123: OK, done. Next time, please add the license. And please add categories. Thanks, Yann (talk) 09:02, 16 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

I am very sorry for the copyright violations. I am a new contributor and I didn't fully understand the strict copyright rules here. I want to clarify that I had no bad intentions or any commercial purpose. I only wanted to provide visual context for the articles to help readers understand the topic better. I thought providing the source link was enough. I now realize that I was wrong. I promise that I will not upload any more images like this. I have learned my lesson. Please forgive my mistake and do not block my account. Thank you. L'empereur Napoléon (talk) 15:29, 18 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Reception of Grand Duke Alexander Nikolayevich by Prince Metternich in the Vienna Hofburg in 1829, by Ferdinand Georg Waldmüller.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Reception of Grand Duke Alexander Nikolayevich by Prince Metternich in the Vienna Hofburg in 1829, by Ferdinand Georg Waldmüller.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 20 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Joan Baez and Bob Dylan.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Joan Baez and Bob Dylan.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 20 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Un peu à la bourre

...mais jamais trop tard (en janvier) !

🌟 Bonne année -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:34, 21 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

A propos de File:Rainbowfish scale.jpg

Sur File:Rainbowfish scale.jpg que tu as supprimé, j'aimerais reprendre la discussion, si possible sur ma page où je t'ai répondu en détail. Mon argument est que c'est une illustration technique (technique d'impression et de façonnage), et pas artistique. Si tu n'es pas d'accord, j'aimerais si possible que tu argumentes, et qu'on puisse porter le débat ailleurs, en toute bonne foi. Je ne connais pas la procédure sur Commons, je ne sais pas s'il faut remonter à la Pompe, ou s'il y a un lieu plus adapté. Amicalement, GAllegre (talk) 08:11, 22 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

@GAllegre: Bonjour, Les illustrations techniques ont aussi un droit d'auteur. Tu peux demander la restauration sur la page COM:UDR, mais je doute que cette image soit restaurée sans une licence libre de l'auteur. Yann (talk) 09:22, 22 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Ce n'est pas une "illustration technique" au sens de dessin technique, mon expression était peut-être maladroite. C'est un scan illustrant une technique d'impression. L'intérêt n'est pas dans la création graphique (aspect artistique), mais dans le processus technique qui a permis son impression (le marquage à chaud). C'est le résultat d'une chaîne de production. En tous les cas, merci pour le lien, je vais sans doute effectivement demander sa restauration. GAllegre (talk) 12:55, 22 January 2026 (UTC)Reply